University of Strathclyde US, UK and EU Flags Takes you to the main page for this section

Sampling Details

The annual New Democracies Barometer (NDB) surveys are undertaken by established national institutes regularly conducting nationwide representative sample surveys. In Vienna the Paul Lazarsfeld Society co-ordinates two survey networks with Central and East European affiliates, Fessel & GfK, and MITROPA and ASCII files are merged into annual multi-national SPSS system files by the Centre for the Study of Public Policy. In addition to using ten national languages for fieldwork, there are two additional languages for co-ordination, English and German.

All interviews are face-to-face, since limited telephone ownership means that phone interviews are not a representative sample. The basic sampling procedure in each country follows ESOMAR principles of a multi-stage, random probability sample, in which the population is stratified regionally and within regions according to urban/rural divisions and town size. One hundred or more primary sampling units (PSU) are drawn. Within each PSU individual respondents are chosen on the basis of standard random procedures, such as the Kish matrix or selecting the household member next having a birthday. A proportion of interviews is subsequently verified by the survey institute. For a full discussion of GfK sampling procedures in the region, see the Annex of Central and Eastern Eurobarometer (Brussels: European Commission DG X, No. 9, March, 1996)

Each national survey is checked for representativeness by gender, age, education, region and town size. Where appropriate, weights are introduced to match the sample to the census. In no case do weights produce major changes in the sample composition or responses. In some countries samples routinely include respondents from age 15 upwards. Where this happens, youthful respondents are excluded from the analysis; this reduces slightly responses analyzed from the total of 52,940 interviews. All the data reported here are for respondents age 18 and upwards. In Croatia, the war zone is excluded from the sample.

NDB-I Autumn 1991

Country Institute fieldwork N interviews
Bulgaria NAPOC Sofia December 1002
*Czechoslovakia GfK Prague November-December 1034
Hungary GfK Budapest November 1019
Poland Gfk Warsaw October 1193
Romania IRSOP Bucharest December 1000
Slovenia Sociology Institute U. Ljubljana Feb-March 1992 1049
Austria IFES Vienna November 1954
Total interviews 8251
*A single sample in what was then a singlestate; responses subdivided to report separate Czech and Slovak responses here.

NDB-II Winter 1992/93

Country Institute fieldwork N interviews
Belarus Belarus Public Opinion Minsk 23 Nov-1 Dec 1225
Bulgaria Balkan British Social SurveysSofia 5-14 December 1164
Croatia CEMA/Mitropa Zagreb December 1000
Czech Rep GfK Prague Nov/March: 2waves* 1408
Slovakia GfK Prague Nov/March: 2waves* 625
Hungary GfK Budapest 13-23 November 970
Poland GfK Warsaw 21 Nov-5 December 1113
Romania IRSOP Bucharest December 1000
Slovenia Sociology Institute U. Ljubljana February 1013
Ukraine Ukrainian Academy of SciencesKiev Dec 1000
  Total interviews 10518
*Two surveys were done in the former Czechoslovakia, 10 Nov-7 Dec 1992, and 11 February-1 March 1993, following its break up. Since the data showed no significant changes between waves, results are pooled for the Czech Republic and for the Slovak Republic.

NDB-III Winter 1993/94

Country Institute fieldwork N interviews
Belarus Belarus Sociological Service 23 Nov-1 December 1000
  GfK Minsk 5- 27 January 1067
Bulgaria Balkan British Social SurveysSofia    5-14 December 1139
Croatia Mitropa Zagreb 15 Jan-15February 1000
Czech Republic GfK Prague 14-31 March 1167
Slovakia GfK Prague 14-31 March 574
Hungary GfK Budapest 19-29 November 1060
Poland GfK Warsaw 26 Nov-3 December 1057
Romania IRSOP Bucharest 13-19 January 1000
Slovenia Sociology Institute U. Ljubljana 24 Mar-14 Apr 1023
Ukraine SOCIS Kiev 5-27 January 1000
  Total interviews 11087

 

NDB-IV Autumn 1995

Country Institute fieldwork N interviews
Belarus Sociological Service 18-27November  1000
Bulgaria Balkan British Social Survey 23-29 November 1184
Croatia Mitropa Zagreb 13-27 November 1000
Czech Republic GfK Prague 1-11 December 978
Hungary GfK Budapest 20 Oct-8 November 1067
Poland GfK Warsaw 25 Oct-7 November 1057
Romania GfK Romania 1-11 December 1038
Slovakia GfK 7-20 Nov and 30 Nov-18Dec 1117
Slovenia Sociology Institute U. Ljubljana    1-31 Nov 1000
Ukraine SOCIS-Gallup Kiev 30 Nov-8December 1000
  Total interviews 10441
 

NDB-V Winter/Spring 1998

Country Institute fieldwork N interviews
Belarus Socium Minsk 4-28 February 1000
Bulgaria GfK Bulgaria Sofia 16-30April 1007
Croatia Mitropa Zagreb 17-31 March 1000
Czech Republic GfK Praha 17-27 April 1017
Hungary GfK Hungaria Budapest    27March-3 April 1017
Poland GfK Polonia Warsaw 27 February-4March 1141
Romania CSOP Bucharest 7-28 April 1241
Slovakia KMG Bratislava 23 March-6April 1011
Slovenia PR + PM Maribor 7-30 April 1000
Ukraine Socis-Gallup Kyiv 30 March-8April 1161
F.R. Yugoslavia Argument Belgrade 7-19 March 1000
Austria IFES Vienna 28 Jan-23 February 1048
  Total interviews 12643
Conventions for reporting data

The Central and East Europe means are created by weighting the total respondents of each country to 1000 cases, and then dividing by the number of countries where a given question is asked, so that each contributes an equal share to the overall mean figure. When a question was not asked or not asked in a comparable format in a country, it is omitted from the calculation of the NDB mean.


CSPP School of Government & Public Policy U. of Strathclyde Glasgow G1 1XQ Scotland
Email: cspp@strath.ac.uk